I was told for most of my life that if you don’t vote then don’t complain! That is the basic premise behind democracy, however I believe the opposite is true, if you vote then you do NOT have a voice.
Alberta is having an election on Monday, April 23rd, 2012 and the US is having a big election in November for ‘President’. So I thought it would be great to have some discussions about what this really means.
When ‘constituents’ elect a MLA, MP or President, a fiduciary relationship is established. The constituents were the grantor and the individual elected becomes the agent, which carries fiduciary responsibilities. A trust is established but something more important happens. The ‘constituents’ voluntarily elect him / her to ‘represent’ them. This is, in my opinion, a form of ‘power of attorney’. As such the elected representative now has the ‘constituents’ authority to act on their behalf and as such the ‘constituents’ no longer have the authority to say anything because they passed that authority onto their ‘representative’.
I found a very interesting court ruling from the Supreme Court of British Columbia. In this ruling it implies the ‘supreme authority’ being the people.
[24] In Canada , the Crown exists in the form of the federal Governor General or provincial Lieutenant Governors. Canadian constitutional law does not grant Governor Generals and Lieutenant Governors the powers of absolute monarchs. Instead, it recognizes that these monarchial powers are now vested in the legislature. As Hogg, supra, states at 241 – 242:
Since 1930, all Canadian Governors General have been selected by the Canadian Prime Minister with the Queen merely formalizing the appointment … The effect of responsible government is to transfer effective political power to elected officials.
Hence, Parliament is supreme because it represents the will of the people.
Read that last sentence again (I bolded it to highlight the importance). What the BC Supreme Court is really saying is that the people are supreme but because the people voted for their representatives they handed over their authority to the Parliament making it supreme! I believe it is a form of ‘Power of Attorney’ and as such when that happens you no longer have any authority to govern yourself because you handed that authority to Parliament. That is why the courts rule that Parliament is supreme and not the people. I believe that happens when you ‘register’ to be on the ‘voters list’ and NOT when you place your ‘X’ on the ballot. There are a whole bunch of other places where that happens too, but in the spirit of the elections, I point this out specifically.
If you read paragraphs 20 – 25 of the above court ruling and paragraph 67 of the Canadian Supreme Court Ruling ‘Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 SCR 217’, it is clear that they view the people as the ultimate authority as represented in Parliament or the Legislative Assembly.
Question: If you are the authority, does that make you the ‘Head of State’?
Ahhh, what a concept eh! Interesting idea introduced to me by a friend. I don’t specifically use those words but when it all gets boiled down, I believe the answer is YES and that is why I keep saying to people that you are a King or Queen! I decided to dedicate Tuesday’s class to this very topic as it fits in so perfectly with my approach to self governance. I also dedicate this class to a small group of dedicated, brilliant and extremely intelligent & generous friends who are also doing their own research and they are willing to share with me their thoughts and experiences. I do not share names to protect their privacy, but this idea of ‘Head of State’ is an interesting one to say the least. There are LOTS of implications with this idea and they fit i n perfectly with what I believe and how I govern myself. Different words to express similar ideas.
So feel free to vote if you want to hand over your authority to some representative. I don’t vote because I want to retain my authority to govern myself. I don’t vote because I believe that God, the Creator of Heaven and Earth are the supreme authority and as such is my master. I have a duty to ensure I do not grant my authority, granted to me by God, to any other soul.
If you like, please join me this Tuesday or watch the recorded webinar in the private members area. I will explore the ideas around fiduciary, trusts, representatives and other key words and ideas that surround the Courts claim that Parliament is supreme and how that fits in with our actions which hand our authority to them on a silver platter. I will also cover what you can do about it!


April 24th, 2012
rob in the pagé family
Posted in
Tags: 
I was able to view “Ungrip” – very impressive indeed! My hat’s off to Rob in the Pagé family. I live in Ontario, and wondered if our provincial laws were similarly structured (I am dwarfed by your legal knowledge – I tend to get bogged down with details and can’t see forest for trees). My real question is this: With the position that you hold – maintaining the status of a “natural person” – are you able to cross the US [or other] borders? While you may not need to prove citizenship in our native Canada, how does that fly when you need to prove what country you belong to [and I realize that Canada technically refers only to the freshwaters and oceans]?
Paul; I don’t use the ‘natural person’ stuff and I have not viewed myself as that for years. I believe the statutes and regulations are similar between Alberta and Ontario but there are differences and you will need to know them depending on how deeply your life is integrated with the state.
I am confident that if I had to travel I could. However I have no desire to do so and frankly it is my opinion that it is too dangerous for me to travel internationally as well. So I just stay home and I have faith that one day we will all be able to travel without papers, etc. Just not now. I find that the system is changing and morphing because of the work that people are doing and things are getting more challenging.
Voy a copiarte el anteultimo parrafo,que te explicas muy bien,el poder es de cada persona y no hay que otorgarlo ni a la re-evolucion .Agur bero bat
Translation (via Google)
I’ll copy you the penultimate paragraph, you explain very well, power is on the individual and should not grant it or to re-evolution. Agur bero bat
Best I can do as I don’t know Spanish.
Hi Rob,
We will be voting (provincial elections) here in Quebec on September 4th. This article has helped me position myself on voting – thank you for your insights. But I do have a question: even if I do not vote for a party, should I go and cancel my vote, which means just put an X across the ballot? My friends suggest I do this, so my vote is not “stolen”. But does this make any sense? I would like your thoughts on this. Thank you!!
Sonya;
My opinion is that as soon as you ‘register’ to be on the voters list or show ID to put a big fat ‘X’ across the ballot, then you have consented to being governed and gave them power of attorney. It is all a fiction in my opinion.
Hi Rob, I’m wondering if you’ve seen whether getting added to a voters list once means that you’re hooked in or does it need to be renewed every election…. Also, this would mean that simply the act of moving negates the validity of it?
Thanks so much for all your research.
Chef;
I’ve not seen anything specifically about what you mentioned. However, it is clear to me that there is an urgency for them to update it on a regular basis, so it is possible that the agreement has a limit. I don’t think moving would break that agreement though. They still make assumptions and will act upon those assumptions unless you rebutt them. So what is required is saying ‘no’. Silence is still a ‘yes’.